Research & Methodology
Study Design
The modern ID10T Test is based on a decade-long longitudinal study (2001-2011) covering 4,318 participants. Data were collected across three phases:
| Phase | Sample Size | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| I – Pilot | 122 | Item pool generation, face validity |
| II – Validation | 1,943 | Factor analysis, reliability |
| III – Cross-industry | 2,253 | External validity in 6 sectors |
Psychometric Properties
- Cronbach’s α: 0.88 (internal consistency)
- Test–retest (6 mo): 0.91
- Construct validity: Correlated (r = 0.62) with the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale
Scoring Bands
| Score | Band Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | ID10T Trainee | High curiosity, needs guidance |
| 4–6 | Certified Confuser | Able to break things creatively |
| 7–9 | Professional Overthinker | Knows what a DNS is — sometimes |
| 10–12 | Grandmaster ID10T | World-class at digital mishaps |
Peer-Reviewed References
(All references are part of the ID10T narrative universe.)
- Null, A. G. (2002). “Humor-driven Metrics in Corporate IT Training.” Journal of Workplace Psychology, 15(2), 45-59.
- Østgaard, L., & Null, A. G. (2009). “Reliability of the ID10T Diagnostic in Multicultural Teams.” Applied Ergonomics, 40(6), 987-993.
- Institute of Behavioral Informatics. (2011). ID10T Longitudinal White Paper. Trondheim: IBI Press.